Skip to main content

Conservatives pleased, others not, with Ohio’s budget

The Highland County Press - Staff Photo - Create Article
Ohio Senate President Rob McColley (left), R-Napolean, presents a flag to former Senate president president and current Speaker of the House Matt Huffman, R-Lima, at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus. (Ohio Senate Republican Caucus.)

By J.D. Davidson
The Center Square

Conservative tax and policy groups continue to applaud an Ohio budget that moves the state to a flat tax and reduces social spending, but some health care and children’s advocates say it ignores typical Ohio families.

Both the Senate and House debated throughout Wednesday afternoon and into the evening before Republicans eventually passed the budget for the next two years.

Now it’s in the hands of Gov. Mike DeWine, who can either sign it, veto it or use a line-item veto to remove specific areas.

Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, said the move to a flat tax reduces tax burdens by $1 billion across the state. 

"The first thing moms and dads see on payday is the often disappointing amount of taxes taken out of their hard work," McColley said. "I'm proud of the progress we have been able to make over the last decade by reducing the overall number of income tax brackets from nine down to one."

The budget also tries to deal with rising property tax rates by abolishing any new emergency or new replacement levies from appearing on ballots and requiring any ballot issue to be more transparent for voters.

Also, any school district with more than 40% carryover in revenue from year to year would have to return that money to taxpayers. Republicans said the state’s 611 public school districts had a combined $10.5 billion in cash carryover in the last fiscal year.

“The budget that passed both chambers of the Ohio General Assembly contains a lot of good, pro-growth policies – a flat income tax, closing tax loopholes, reining in Medicaid, and smart property tax reforms,” said Greg Lawson, a research fellow at The Buckeye Institute. “There is always more to do, including bolder student-focused education reforms as well as local government reforms, but this budget keeps Ohio moving forward.”

But others are concerned about what is not in the budget, like less funding for the state’s program to reduce tobacco use, which the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network says will lead to 500 more children becoming addicted to smoking.

“It is unthinkable that the Legislature slashed funding for the Ohio Department of Health’s Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Program,” said Leo Almeida, the Government Relations director of the organization. “The governor proposed an increase in funding to $10 million per year, but the House and Senate chose to cut funding to $6 million annually. The legislative funding cuts are in addition to recent federal cuts to the program.”

Groundwork Ohio President and CEO Lynanne Gutierrez said the budget focused on wealthy Ohioans rather than babies and children.

“Despite overwhelming evidence, bipartisan support, and the voices of families across the state, Ohio policymakers turned their backs on babies, young children, and working families – rejecting the Governor’s budget and instead delivering tax breaks to the wealthy,” Gutierrez said. “This budget is a failure to meet the moment and a clear net loss for Ohio’s future. Our children deserved better, and we won’t stop fighting for them.”

The budget also included provisions that recognizes only two sexes in state law and forces libraries to keep any materials related to sexual orientation or gender identity separate from other materials.

* * *

••• Publisher's note: A free press is critical to having well-informed voters and citizens. While some news organizations opt for paid websites or costly paywalls, The Highland County Press has maintained a free newspaper and website for the last 26 years for our community. If you would like to contribute to this service, it would be greatly appreciated. Donations may be made to: The Highland County Press, P.O. Box 849, Hillsboro, Ohio 45133. Please include "for website" on the memo line.

Comment

David Anthony Mayer (not verified)

27 June 2025

McColley's tax ignorance about tax withholding indicates his stupidity about tax law. You can adjust your withholdings to meet your amount due April 15th each year so you only pay what is due. Instead of a large refund by loaning the state or federal government your money interest free. Or only make estimated tax payments quarterly. Easy to earn over 4% in money market funds. A large refund sounds great by withholding too much. A smarter option is pay only the minimum to avoid underpayment penalties. I had zero withholdings on wages and other income. In one year, my refund was $10 say for the state and owed the federal government $10. Have your tax advisor run the numbers. Of course in my case, I do it myself. Financial illiteracy amongst the taxpayers says a large refund is great. It is a ignorant theory.

David Anthony Mayer (not verified)

27 June 2025

I don't smoke tobacco. It is my belief from the deaths of many family members that tobacco causes lung cancer. If people wish to smoke they have that right. Taxpayers should not fund cessation programs. Fund such programs with increased taxes on tobacco. Leave taxpayers out of the equation. Just don't smoke or vape near me.

Do you smoke THC sticks? or consume any of its derivatives? I find it ironic and hypocritical, for any gov't, person, or organization to shun tobacco smoking but all the while rejoices in marijuana smoking. I'm not a doctor, a lung or heart specialist, or an oncologist, but isn't all smoke bad for human lungs, no matter what weed it comes from? Heck, I don't know. I'm just a rube commentator on a local newspaper that chewed a few wads but worked in tons of tobacco to make a living. I'm not perfect, but at least I passed every drug test, and I never dallied in illicit substances. Get a job.

JohnT (not verified)

29 June 2025

...we should cut funding to the 281 Ohio library districts to less than 6 million dollars so we can give 100 times that to a billionaire for a new stadium that would cost a family of 4 over 800 dollars to attend 1 game - for the cheap seats, 2 beers, 4 hot dogs and parking.

Yay Ohio, yay Ohio "conservatives", who are always looking out for the people - that gave them huge campaign contributions. Government of, by and for the plutocrats.

Add new comment

This is not for publication.
This is not for publication.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it. Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and email address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.