Ohio voters reject Issue 1 constitutional amendment changes, the Associated Press projects
Ohio voters have rejected state Issue 1, which sought to make it harder for voters to pass constitutional amendments, the Associated Press has projected.
The full counting of unofficial results is ongoing, but the AP has officially projected that the “No” side has won.
As of 10 p.m., with three-fourths of precincts counted statewide, the No side was winning 56.45 percent to 43.55 percent.
Results will remain unofficial until they are certified by county boards of elections later this month. Issue 1 was the only question on the ballot Aug. 8.
Issue 1 proposed to raise the threshold for passing amendments to the Ohio Constitution from a simple majority of 50 percent plus one to 60 percent. It also proposed to require citizen amendment initiatives gather signatures from all 88 Ohio counties instead of the current 44, and sought to eliminate a 10-day curing period to correct invalidated signatures.
The controversial measure was first introduced by Republican Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose and Ashville Republican state Rep. Brian Stewart late last year. After failing to place it on the May primary ballot, Ohio Republican lawmakers brought back a special August election for the proposal this summer, after eliminating most August elections with legislation in December 2022.
LaRose originally denied that the effort to make it more difficult for voters to pass constitutional amendments was tied to an abortion rights amendment proposal that will be considered by Ohio voters in November. However, in a letter to fellow Republican lawmakers shortly after introducing the proposal, Stewart said they should support the effort to stop both the abortion rights amendment as well as any further anti-gerrymandering reform voters might bring.
On May 22, LaRose told a Seneca County Republican Party dinner that Issue 1 was “100 percent about keeping a radical pro-abortion amendment out of our constitution.”
LaRose campaigned vigorously to try to convince voters to pass the proposal, making campaign appearances with an anti-abortion lobbyist named Mike Gonidakis, and sharing a debate stage with Gonidakis on television to argue for the Yes side.
An opinion poll conducted in July showed 59 percent of Ohioans support placing abortion rights in the state constitution.
Issue 1 was opposed by a coalition of more than 240 bipartisan groups across Ohio, four bipartisan former governors, five bipartisan former attorneys general, the Libertarian Party of Ohio, the Ohio Green Party, the Ohio Forward Party, and a wide variety of union groups, as well as good-government groups such as the League of Women Voters of Ohio and Common Cause Ohio.
The Issue 1 amendment change was brought to the ballot with the votes of all 26 Ohio Senate Republicans including Senate President Matt Huffman, and 62 out of 67 Ohio House Republicans including House Speaker Jason Stephens.
Issue 1 was endorsed by Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, Sec. of State LaRose, Attorney General Dave Yost, Ohio Auditor Keith Faber, Ohio Treasurer Robert Sprague, Ohio U.S. Sen. J.D. Vance, and groups including Ohio Right to Life, the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, the Ohio Restaurant Association, the Ohio Farm Bureau and the Center for Christian Virtue.
Comment
Issue One
We already have nearly zero representation from our elected officials, why would we give up what little voice we currently have? Find another way to push back against political opponents.
Be Careful What You Wish For
Some of you got what you wanted. The defeat of Issue 1. We warned of special interests coming in, spending a lot of money to flood heavily populated areas with false and misleading information to get the result they wanted. That is exactly how Issue 1 was defeated. Out of 88 counties, 22 (25%) were responsible for the end result. The areas around Toledo, Cleveland, Akron, Columbus, Dayton and Cincinnati. Does this represent the will of the people of Ohio? I don't think so. Look how far this country as a whole has fallen the last two years. How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.... Now they can start on Ohio. By the way, Highland County was 72 for Issue 1 and 28 against. This link shows the actual map illustrating how out of balance this was: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/08/08/ohio-issue-1-el…
The Voters Won and Showed up to Vote No against 1
Ohio hasn't seen turnout above 30% for a primary election since 2016. Tuesday's 38% turnout in a special election, which was predicted to be extemely low, represents nearly double the turnout of the May 2022 primaries which was below 21% turnout. Majority wins. Ohio is predominantly GOP and solidly red. So where were the other 62%of voters? Most of which are GOP voters? Logically in a GOP state you expect Issue 1 to pass with Yes votes. It did not happen. Several possible factors here. The HB6 scandal tarnished the GOP further as the party of the rich and powerful with no rules applying to them. The LaRose flip flop comment on reproductive rights as to why this election was called. Denied then said yeah, that's it. The general consensus is Columbus can't even get redistricting completed. The "decline to state" voters came out and some will say many GOP registered voters are fed up with the GOP dirty tricks and cloud of corruption crossed over to vote No. Of course some GOP voters are actually Democrats who pulled GOP ballots in the last primary, to vote against select Republicans. Bottom line is the No voters were better organized and focused on defeating this issue. It should carry over in Ohio and nationally that the voters are sick of political business as usual. The "Larry Householder defense" of everyone does it so it must be legal wh, ich failed miserably with a 20 year conviction. (Still laughing over that verdict.) Voters against 1 were also telling out of state money donations of 84% is not acceptable. Ohio is to be run by Ohioan's and not fear mongering false ads and media.
Time for Ethics Reform Initiative?
Considering the recent conviction of Larry Householder and the amount of misleading ads and dark money funding wbich came from the US Court in Cincinnati, the time for ethics reform is now. . Ethics reform was a huge takeaway from the 61 Million HB6 scandal. Since the GOP has not addressed ethics reform, and probably won't, one could hope the people will via a ballot initiative. Frank LaRose denied his poltical intentions for issue 1, and then admitted his goals. Time to end his political career.