Skip to main content

Protecting Second Amendment rights for disabled veterans

The Highland County Press - Staff Photo - Create Article

By U.S. Rep. Tom Cole
R-Oklahoma

As enshrined in the Constitution, the Second Amendment guarantees law-abiding citizens of the United States the right to bear arms. Freedom and personal responsibility are pillars of our nation, and the Second Amendment must be protected, especially for those who suffered injury or were disabled while serving in our armed forces protecting the freedom of others.

Stabilizing pistol braces were created and manufactured for the purposes of disabled citizens and veterans to hold, stabilize, aim and fire correctly and safely. Unfortunately, the Biden Administration has deemed these braces “particularly lethal,” and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has posted a rule amending the regulatory definition of “rifle” to reclassify pistols with stabilizing-brace attachments as “short-barreled rifles.” This means these firearms are subject to heightened legal requirements and potential criminal penalties under the National Firearms Act.

ATF’s rule not only hinders disabled law-abiding gun owners from safely operating their firearm, but it creates legal traps for the millions of Americans who own stabilizing braces. More specifically, this rule would require nearly 4 million Americans who own stabilizing pistol braces to dispose of, alter or register this device or they will be reclassified as felons for possessing firearms that were considered lawfully acquired at the time of their purchase.

Because of this, earlier this month the House of Representatives passed a bipartisan resolution to disapprove of this final rule. Even the Obama-era ATF recognized the legitimate function of these devices. The Biden Administration’s reversal of a decade of precedent is a clear violation of the Second Amendment and the constitutionally protected rights of law-abiding and responsible gun owning Americans.

I was proud to join every member of the Oklahoma delegation in cosponsoring this important resolution. Although President Biden plans to veto this resolution, its bipartisan passage in both chambers of Congress shows that lawmakers are equally frustrated with this overreach from the Biden Administration and unfairness toward responsible gun owners.

Indeed, our founding fathers knew that true freedom from despotism required ordinary citizens to have the means to defend themselves. Most Americans know that guns are tools that must be used responsibly. Although our society has evolved, this right to bear arms remains, and I am committed to ensuring the Second Amendment is not violated.

Comment

Matthew (not verified)

29 June 2023

Wouldn't a sling (a tried a true marksmanship technique), a bi-pod, a sandbag, a mound of dirt, or a truck hood stabilize a firearm during the act of shooting? Hey, let's go after the conservative "peckerwoods" who legally acquire guns instead of the evil people and criminals. Am I wrong to think that rational, intelligent citizens should have access to a variety of weapons? And am I insensitive to think that felons, abusive/violent people, addicted people, and the mentally unstable should be barred from possessing firearms? See Hunter Biden as an example (Proud dad Joe is, I'm sure.) We could also go after illegal aliens too. Where there's smoke there's fire, to quote an axiom. A couple of the many things I brag about is 1.) I voted when I was 17 years old. And 2.) I had full possession of an 18-shot semi-automatic rifle when I was 14 years old. These facts occurred in the 1990's. Not too far removed from the progressive-driven woke culture of whiners.

Add new comment

This is not for publication.
This is not for publication.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it. Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and email address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.