Skip to main content

Gov. Sununu signs voter ID law; Democrats threaten lawsuits

By Sarah Roderick-Fitch
The Center Square

In a move that goes into effect after this year's election cycle, New Hampshire strengthened its voting laws by eliminating voter identification exceptions.

The new law signed by Gov. Chris Sununu signifies a win for Republicans, who are eager to strengthen voting laws nationwide.

Sununu praised the Republican-backed bill, citing the Granite State’s prominence in the electoral process and dedication to promoting election integrity.

“We have a proud tradition and proven track record of conducting elections that are trusted and true," he said. "Looking forward to the next decade or two, this legislation will instill even more integrity and trust in the voting process.”

Despite the perceived Republican victory, Sununu emphasized in a statement that the legislation would not take effect until 60 days after the governor’s signature, adding, “the 2024 election cycle will not be impacted in any way.”

Despite the delay in the new law until after the election, the ACLU of New Hampshire is decrying it as an “anti-voting rights bill.”

Earlier in the week, the group said the legislation was unnecessary, defending fair elections.

“[The law] would make dramatic changes to New Hampshire’s election laws even though our elections are already secure, accurate, and fair,” the group posted to social media. “Lawmakers have no place trying to silence constituents with laws that impose new, unnecessary burdens on voters.”

The New Hampshire Republican Party defended the new law, citing examples of when identification is required.

“You can’t legally obtain employment in the United States without providing proof of citizenship or work authorization,” The New Hampshire Republican Party posted to X, formerly Twitter. “If 14-year-olds can provide a birth certificate to get a job bagging groceries, 18-year-olds can provide one to register to vote.”

Democratic state Rep. Angela Brennan warns the new legislation is unconstitutional and will result in “expensive lawsuits.”

“This bill HB 1569, now signed into law, is unconstitutional and don’t just take my word for it – Republican Senator Jim Gray said so as well. Expect extensive and expensive lawsuits on taxpayers’ dime,” Brennan posted on X.

* * *
••• Publisher's note: A free press is critical to having well-informed voters and citizens. While some news organizations opt for paid websites or costly paywalls, The Highland County Press has maintained a free newspaper and website for the last 25 years for our community. If you would like to contribute to this service, it would be greatly appreciated. Donations may be made to: The Highland County Press, P.O. Box 849, Hillsboro, Ohio 45133. Please include "for website" on the memo line.

Add new comment

This is not for publication.
This is not for publication.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it. Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and email address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.